AI USE CASES YOU CAN REUSE.English edition · Individuals, independents, small businesses
Spotted on the web

Review large documents on an agent's cloud computer

Use described publicly by Reddit — r/ChatGPT (u/dry_towelette99) (1 October 2026), summarised by the desk. Not tested by iadujour.

The result to aim for

To entrust an agent with a major documentary rereading work, on his own cloud machine, so that he advances in time without losing the thread.

Before you start

Tool cited by the source: Dots. Gather the information the prompt asks for. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.

The method, in three steps.

  1. Gather the context

    Gather the information described in the prompt.

  2. Adapt the prompt

    Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into the AI assistant you use. The cited tool (Dots) is not necessarily available to the public..

  3. Reread before using

    Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.

Your starting point.

Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.

The prompt to customise
You're my documentary review assistant. You work persistently on a voluminous corpus.

Objective: Read all the documents provided, keep in place, and produce a workable synthesis.

For each document, extract:
- the subject in one sentence
- points that require a human decision
- inconsistencies or risks
- recommended actions

Available: a recapitulative table, then a 1 page note. If the work is long, indicate exactly where you stopped to be able to resume.

What deserves your attention

A visually convincing result can still be wrong. Check facts, recipients and commitments before any use. For an external action, keep a suitable validation step.
Origin of the case. Use described publicly by Reddit — r/ChatGPT (u/dry_towelette99) (1 October 2026).
Proof level: Public declarative post. Source checked on 10 November 2026. Use described by the source, not tested by the desk. Original summary written by iadujour.fr: figures and claims are the source’s; the prompt is a desk proposal, not a quotation.
TO GO FURTHER

Other ideas to put to work.

The whole Productivity theme
DISCUSSION

Comments.

A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.

Published comments

Loading comments…

    Leave a comment

    Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.