The result to aim for
Also in Saint-Genis-Laval, a search engine enriched by the general AI includes the question, returns a synthetic answer and has been adapted to read the decrees, deliberations and minutes in PDF.
What was done
In the same Wikit interview of 5 November 2025, Jacky Béjean presents the "new generation" search engine as an innovation born during the project: chatbots are becoming widespread, few cities have an engine that understands natural language. A classic engine, he says, is content with keywords and a raw list; user opens several pages. The engine enriched by the general AI analyses the intention, selects the information and returns it as a synthetic response, often with links. The technical challenge was the integration of administrative documents (decisions, deliberations, minutes): the engine had to read PDFs, identify the right documents and display them clearly. Jacky Béjean said this challenge was raised by the Wikit team. No requests are published.
Before you start
Tool cited by the source: Search engine IA (Wikit Seminics). Gather the information the prompt asks for. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.
The method, in three steps.
Gather the context
Gather the information described in the prompt.
Adapt the prompt
Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into the AI assistant you use. The cited tool (Search engine IA (Wikit Seminics)) is not necessarily available to the public..
Reread before using
Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.
Your starting point.
Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.
Question: Excerpts from pages of the site and PDF (decisions, proceedings, PV): 1. Answer by quoting the document, date and passage. 2. If two documents follow or contradict each other, present them in chronological order. 3. Distinguishes clearly what is a synthesis and what is a quote. No item, date or vote.
What deserves your attention
Proof level: Statement by the tool’s publisher. Source checked on 10 November 2026. Use described by the source, not tested by the desk. Original summary written by iadujour.fr: figures and claims are the source’s; the prompt is a desk proposal, not a quotation.
Comments.
A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.
Published comments
Loading comments…
Leave a comment
Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.