The result to aim for
Stéphanie Strause, HRD of Openclassrooms (250 employees), uses the AI in recruitment to reread job forms, generate appropriate questions, and compare answers to practical cases from pre-established corrections.
What was done
Cegid & Opinion 2025 selection of "Kings of the AI" (7 October 2025). One workshop identified possible uses a year and a half ago, crossed with the roadmap. The objective is to "tool managers and improve the daily lives of employees". On the evaluation: "We pre-set corrections for practical cases, then inject the answers into the AI to compare the applications more rapidely and objectively. She insists on accompaniment and scoping "without privacy risks". The article does not name the tool or publish a recruitment deadline.
Before you start
Tool cited by the source: generative AI (unspecified); other tools cited: generative AI. Fill in the bracketed items: [coller]. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.
The method, in three steps.
Gather the context
Spot the bracketed items in the prompt (
[coller]) and prepare what they ask for.Adapt the prompt
Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into the AI assistant you use. The cited tool (generative AI (unspecified)) is not necessarily available to the public..
Reread before using
Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.
Your starting point.
Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.
Post form: [coller]. Corrected (expected) case: [coller]. Candidate's anonymous answer: [coller]. 1) 8 interview questions related to the position. (2) Deviations from the correction, without note. No criteria of age, origin or health are used.
What deserves your attention
Proof level: Testimony published by an identified source. Source checked on 10 November 2026. Use described by the source, not tested by the desk. Original summary written by iadujour.fr: figures and claims are the source’s; the prompt is a desk proposal, not a quotation.
Comments.
A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.
Published comments
Loading comments…
Leave a comment
Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.