The result to aim for
On the ground, the City of Cannes uses Vialytics to analyze its road and signs, Greehill for the digital twin of its trees and Cortexia for its cleanliness tours.
What was done
According to Sophianet, which reports on a presentation by the Cannes Services Directorate in October 2026, Vialytics analysed 175 km of road and 8,000 signs, Greehill built the digital twin of 15,000 trees and Cortexia was used to optimize urban cleanliness tours. These field tools add to the office practice (internal conversational agent, retranscription of meetings, assistance in public procurement and legal matters): the city has 27 AI assistants, 16 of whom are already available. It also points out its points of vigilance: mandatory human control, attention to figures calculated by the AI and current limitations to produce highly structured documents, which led to a data governance project.
Before you start
Tool cited by the source: Vialytics; other tools cited: Greehill and Cortexia. Gather the information the prompt asks for. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.
The method, in three steps.
Gather the context
Gather the information described in the prompt.
Adapt the prompt
Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into the AI assistant you use. The cited tool (Vialytics) is not necessarily available to the public..
Reread before using
Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.
Your starting point.
Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.
Here is an export of road defects detected automatically: Our maintenance budget and priorities: 1. Group anomalies by sector and type. 2. Proposed a justified order of priority, indicating that to be checked on the spot. 3. Writes an one-page note for the thing, without invented encryption: the costs remain to be completed by the service.
What deserves your attention
Proof level: Testimony published by an identified source. Source checked on 10 November 2026. Use described by the source, not tested by the desk. Original summary written by iadujour.fr: figures and claims are the source’s; the prompt is a desk proposal, not a quotation.
Comments.
A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.
Published comments
Loading comments…
Leave a comment
Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.