AI USE CASES YOU CAN REUSE.English edition · Individuals, independents, small businesses
Spotted on the web

Cross-checking with a second reading, without proud of it alone

Use described publicly by LinkedIn — Maud Bellier, enseignante de lettres (22 June 2025), summarised by the desk. Not tested by iadujour.

The result to aim for

Maud Bellier, a letter teacher, gave Gemini and Mistral the subjects, the scale and copies of students planned for harmonization. The next day, in a meeting, the copy she had between 12 and 14 with the tools came out at 13. She kept the double reading, not the automatic note.

What was done

LinkedIn (Mad Bellier, 22 June 2025). "I didn't save time but confidence. She does not recommend letting the tool note alone: repetitive comments, unseen opposites. Distinct from Hayette (DNB correction, other URL). No copy is to be reproduced.

Before you start

Tool cited by the source: Gemini; other tools cited: Mistral. Fill in the bracketed items: [coller], [paliers], [coller sans nom]. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.

The method, in three steps.

  1. Gather the context

    Spot the bracketed items in the prompt ([coller], [paliers], [coller sans nom]) and prepare what they ask for.

  2. Adapt the prompt

    Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into Gemini or Mistral.

  3. Reread before using

    Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.

Your starting point.

Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.

The prompt to customise
Subject (public text): [coller]. Official scale (fact): [paliers]. Anonymized copy: [coller sans nom].

Only indicates the bearing (12-14 / etc.) and 3 observations. Invent no process. Distinguish what is in the copy.

What deserves your attention

A note generated is not the note. Keep the scale, never paste nominative copies, and not let the tool decide alone.
Origin of the case. Use described publicly by LinkedIn — Maud Bellier, enseignante de lettres (22 June 2025).
Proof level: Public declarative post. Source checked on 10 November 2026. Use described by the source, not tested by the desk. Original summary written by iadujour.fr: figures and claims are the source’s; the prompt is a desk proposal, not a quotation.
TO GO FURTHER

Other ideas to put to work.

The whole Learning theme
DISCUSSION

Comments.

A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.

Published comments

Loading comments…

    Leave a comment

    Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.