THE MEDIA FOR AI THAT ACTUALLY HELPS.English edition · Understand & take action
Spotted on the web

Producing and auditing time-up cards of CEJM concepts

Use described publicly by Académie de Nantes — Wilfried Robert (lycée La Herdrie) (16 June 2026), summarised by the desk. Not tested by iadujour.

The result to aim for

Wilfried Robert, La Herdrie high school in Basse-Goulaine, has BTS 2nd year (ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini) generate ECJM definitions in two sentences, then make them criticize them before making time cards Up physics.

What was done

TraAM economy-management, Nantes Academy, June 16, 2026 (updated July 6, 2026), scenario 1, April 2026. Scoreboard: tool, number of prompts, carbon/water footprint. Distinct from Point and Boiffard (same URL). Limit 3/URL.

Before you start

Tool cited by the source: ChatGPT / Claude / Gemini; other tools cited: ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. Fill in the bracketed items: [coller]. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.

The method, in three steps.

  1. Gather the context

    Spot the bracketed items in the prompt ([coller]) and prepare what they ask for.

  2. Adapt the prompt

    Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini.

  3. Reread before using

    Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.

Your starting point.

Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.

The prompt to customise
List of notions CEJM: [coller]. Constraint: 2 sentence definition, BTS level.

Offer 8 cards. For each: refers to a risk of legal uncertainty. Do not invent any notion off-list.

What deserves your attention

A fluid definition is not the reference. Cross-check each card, and do not paste copies of students.
Origin of the case. Use described publicly by Académie de Nantes — Wilfried Robert (lycée La Herdrie) (16 June 2026).
Proof level: Institutional source. Source checked on 11 November 2026. Use described by the source, not tested by the desk. Original summary written by iadujour.fr: figures and claims are the source’s; the prompt is a desk proposal, not a quotation.
TO GO FURTHER

Other ideas to put to work.

The whole Learning theme
DISCUSSION

Comments.

A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.

Published comments

Loading comments…

    Leave a comment

    Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.