THE MEDIA FOR AI THAT ACTUALLY HELPS.English edition · Understand & take action
Practical case

Claim return of security deposit after removal

Scenario written by the desk, with a prompt to adapt. This is not a testimony.

The result to aim for

Compare entry and exit records, encrypt what is questionable and write to the landlord in a factual way.

The situation

Deductions not justified, delay exceeded: the security deposit is a frequent source of rental disputes. The assistant helps to confront the two states of the place, to distinguish normal wear and tear and degradation, and to write a letter of complaint, and then to prepare a possible referral to the departmental conciliation commission.

Before you start

Tool cited: ChatGPT; the prompt also works with Claude. Gather the information the prompt asks for. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.

The method, in three steps.

  1. Gather the context

    Gather the information described in the prompt.

  2. Adapt the prompt

    Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into ChatGPT, Le Chat or Claude.

  3. Reread before using

    Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.

Your starting point.

Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk.

The prompt to customise
I left my home on Security deposit: € Amount returned:
State of entry: Release: Deductions announced:

1. Compare the two states of the place room by room.
2. Class each restricted: justified, questionable (normal wear ?), not justified.
3. Write a letter recommended to the reader, factual, with my encrypted request.
4. Indicates the following steps and the official pages to be checked (delay, conciliation).

What deserves your attention

Time limits for return and penalties for delay are established on service-public.fr; Do not quote a memory delay.
Origin of the case. Scenario designed by the iadujour.fr desk, written in November 2026.
Proof level: Practical case written by the desk, no third-party source. This is not a testimony: adapt the prompt to your situation.
TO GO FURTHER

Other ideas to put to work.

The whole Rights theme
DISCUSSION

Comments.

A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.

Published comments

Loading comments…

    Leave a comment

    Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.