THE MEDIA FOR AI THAT ACTUALLY HELPS.English edition · Understand & take action
Spotted on the web

Have ChatGPT write the run of a course, and Claude write the statement of a duty that theIA cannot do instead of the student

Use described publicly by ARBS — Alix de Loriol, enseignante (27 May 2026), summarised by the desk. Not tested by iadujour.

The result to aim for

Alix de Loriol, a teacher in higher schools, prepares his courses faster with ChatGPT (moved according to the objectives) and refines the statements with Claude, looking for homework that theIA cannot perform in place of the students.

What was done

Same ARBS interviews (27 May 2026). She discovered the AI by correcting clearly unwritten reading sheets by the students. She reduced the conventional DMs, demanded interviews and personal facts, allowed the AI to correct the mistakes, refused that she wrote. Test reported: the same copy rated 14 by the AI goes up or down as soon as a positive or negative argument is added — "IA is programmed to please us". A student text on a rafting, "enhanced" by the AI, invented clapotis, span and moon.

Before you start

Tool cited by the source: ChatGPT / Claude; other tools cited: ChatGPT and Claude. Fill in the bracketed items: [coller], [école supérieure]. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.

The method, in three steps.

  1. Gather the context

    Spot the bracketed items in the prompt ([coller], [école supérieure]) and prepare what they ask for.

  2. Adapt the prompt

    Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into ChatGPT or Claude.

  3. Reread before using

    Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.

Your starting point.

Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.

The prompt to customise
Course objective: [coller]. Level: [école supérieure].

Proposes an 8-step run, then a statement of duty that the AI cannot invent (interview, personal observation), and 3 anti-delegation instructions.

What deserves your attention

An AI rating is not an evaluation. A generated statement can remain feasible by chat: testing it yourself before giving it. No nominative copy in the prompt.
Origin of the case. Use described publicly by ARBS — Alix de Loriol, enseignante (27 May 2026).
Proof level: Testimony published by an identified source. Source checked on 10 November 2026. Use described by the source, not tested by the desk. Original summary written by iadujour.fr: figures and claims are the source’s; the prompt is a desk proposal, not a quotation.
TO GO FURTHER

Other ideas to put to work.

The whole Learning theme
DISCUSSION

Comments.

A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.

Published comments

Loading comments…

    Leave a comment

    Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.