THE MEDIA FOR AI THAT ACTUALLY HELPS.English edition · Understand & take action
iadujouriadujour
Saved The 5 in the morning
Spotted on the web

Make philosophy review sheets, then cross-check

Use described publicly by L’Est Républicain — David, final-year student, Nancy (15 June 2026), summarised by the desk. Not tested by iadujour.

ChatGPTLearningSpotted15 June 2026

The result to aim for

David, a senior in Nancy, prepared his philosophy review cards with ChatGPT. On the day of the test, he chose subject 2, and considered himself well prepared, also thanks to the posts of philo teachers.

What was done

East Republican (Aymeric Humbert, 15 June 2026). Distinct from Alexia (summaries, other URL) and Thomas (photofiche, other URL). Chloe, Theo, Ely and Léa (same article): out of wave, 1 person / URL. No name card is published.

Before you start

Tool cited by the source: ChatGPT. Fill in the bracketed items: [leçon, notions, auteurs vus]. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.

The method, in three steps.

  1. Gather the context

    Spot the bracketed items in the prompt ([leçon, notions, auteurs vus]) and prepare what they ask for.

  2. Adapt the prompt

    Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into ChatGPT.

  3. Reread before using

    Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.

Your starting point.

Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.

The prompt to customise
Philosophy course (does, paste, nameless): [leçon, notions, auteurs vus].
Level: terminal. Training only.

Proposes a single page sheet: definition of the concept, 3 thesis of the course (without invented quotation), 2 examples of the course, 3 questions of revision.
If an author or quote is not in the course, do not invent. Don't write the essay.

What deserves your attention

A generated sheet is not the course. Cross-check authors and quotes on the book, and do not paste an essay on the day of the test.
Origin of the case. Use described publicly by L’Est Républicain — David, final-year student, Nancy (15 June 2026).
Proof level: Testimony published by an identified source. Source checked on 11 November 2026. Use described by the source, not tested by the desk. Original summary written by iadujour.fr: figures and claims are the source’s; the prompt is a desk proposal, not a quotation.
TO GO FURTHER

Other ideas to put to work.

The whole Learning theme
DISCUSSION

Comments.

A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.

Published comments

Loading comments…

    Leave a comment

    Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.

    What would you like to do?

    Enter: all results in the catalogue · Arrows: browse · Esc: closeAll use cases