DES CAS D’USAGE D’IA À REPRENDRE.Édition française · Particuliers, indépendants, TPE
PostHog

Trouver des drapeaux récemment supprimés

finding-deleted-feature-flags

En bref

Trouver des drapeaux de fonction qui ont été supprimés dans le projet actif dans une fenêtre de temps récente. Utilisez lorsque l'utilisateur demande "quels drapeaux ont été supprimés au cours des derniers jours N", "montrer les drapeaux récemment supprimés", "qui a supprimé le drapeau X", "audit les suppressions récentes de drapeau", ou quelque chose de similaire. Il gère le système non évident. feature flagsocrat Le booléen supprimé est exposé, mais il n'expose pas de horodatage de la suppression — le nombre réel de suppressions dans le journal d'activité par drapeau doit être recoupé.

Ce que ça fait

  • Quand utiliser cette compétence
  • Le gotcha qui rend ce non-trivial
  • Flux de travail

Pour qui, et un exemple

Personnes dont la tâche correspond : Trouver des drapeaux qui ont été supprimés dans le projet actif dans une fenêtre temporelle récente.

Exemple de demande : « Trouver des drapeaux récemment supprimés : Trouver des drapeaux de fonction qui ont été supprimés dans le projet actif dans une fenêtre de temps récente. »

Trouver des drapeaux de fonction qui ont été supprimés dans le projet actif dans une fenêtre de temps récente. Exemple rédigé par iadujour.fr à partir du SKILL.md, non testé.

Installer

Claude Code : /plugin marketplace add PostHog/skills, puis /plugin install posthog-all@posthog-skills (README).

/plugin marketplace add PostHog/skills
/plugin install posthog-all@posthog-skills

Fonctionne avec

  • Claude Code

Source : README : marketplace Claude Code `/plugin marketplace add PostHog/skills`. D’autres agents ne sont pas nommés.

Niveau : Intermédiaire

Suppose un projet déjà en place chez l’éditeur et les outils décrits dans le SKILL.md.

À savoir

Dépôt officiel PostHog (github.com/PostHog/skills). Skills pour l’analytique produit, les indicateurs de fonctionnalité, le suivi d’erreurs et les workflows d’équipe.

Extrait du SKILL.md

La description d’origine, celle que l’agent lit pour décider de charger la skill (en anglais) :

Find feature flags that were soft-deleted in the active project within a recent time window. Use when the user asks "what flags were deleted in the last N days", "show me recently deleted feature flags", "who deleted flag X", "audit recent […]

Citée depuis le SKILL.md au commit 445764b . Le dossier contient aussi 1 fichier annexe (scripts/).

Le SKILL.md compte 132 lignes et 7 sections principales :

  • When to use this skill
  • The gotcha that makes this non-trivial
  • Workflow
  • Watch-outs
  • Example interaction
  • Related tools
  • Scripts

Licence : MIT

Consultée le 13 novembre 2026 : fichier de licence du dépôt.

La licence autorise la reprise : le texte intégral du SKILL.md est reproduit ci-dessous, sans modification, avec sa mention de licence.

Texte intégral du SKILL.md

Reproduit sans modification depuis PostHog/skills (commit 445764b) , © PostHog, sous licence MIT (fichier de licence d’origine ).

Afficher le SKILL.md original (132 lignes, en anglais)
---
name: finding-deleted-feature-flags
description: 'Find feature flags that were soft-deleted in the active project within a recent time window. Use when the user asks "what flags were deleted in the last N days", "show me recently deleted feature flags", "who deleted flag X", "audit recent flag deletions", or anything similar. Handles the non-obvious gotcha that system.feature_flags exposes the deleted boolean but does not expose a deletion timestamp — the actual deleted-at time lives in the per-flag activity log and must be cross-referenced.'
---

# Finding recently deleted feature flags

This skill produces a list of feature flags that were soft-deleted in the active project within a user-specified time window, along with who deleted each one and when.

## When to use this skill

- The user asks "what flags got deleted last week / in the last N days?"
- The user wants an audit of recent flag deletions (who, when, what was removed)
- The user wants to find when a specific flag was deleted, or by whom
- Any "recently deleted feature flags" framing

Don't use this for **active** stale-flag cleanup — that's `cleaning-up-stale-feature-flags`. This skill is for flags that have already been removed.

## The gotcha that makes this non-trivial

`system.feature_flags` exposes `deleted` as a boolean but does **not** expose `deleted_at`, `updated_at`, or `last_modified_at`. There's no way to filter soft-deleted flags by deletion time in a single SQL query — trying to use those columns will return `Unable to resolve field`.

The actual deletion timestamp lives in the per-flag activity log, reachable only via `posthog:feature-flags-activity-retrieve` (one call per flag id). There is no bulk activity endpoint.

So the workflow is two-stage: SQL to enumerate candidates, then parallel activity-log lookups to find each deletion event.

## Workflow

### 1. Clarify the window if ambiguous

"Last week" is ambiguous — it can mean rolling 7 days from now, or the previous calendar week (Mon–Sun). If the user wasn't explicit, ask, or surface both interpretations in the final report.

Always compute the cutoff in UTC and keep the user's local interpretation in your head separately.

### 2. Enumerate soft-deleted flags via SQL

Query `system.feature_flags` for `deleted = true` in the active project, ordered by `created_at DESC`:

```sql
SELECT id, key, created_at
FROM system.feature_flags
WHERE team_id = <team_id> AND deleted = true
ORDER BY created_at DESC
LIMIT 100
```

Order by `created_at DESC` because deletions empirically cluster near creation — most flags get deleted within a few days of being created — so walking the most-recently-created candidates first finds recent deletions fastest. **But** this is a heuristic, not a guarantee: an older flag deleted recently won't be at the top of this list. Be explicit about that limitation when you report.

`team_id` defaults to the active project, but include it explicitly for clarity.

### 3. Fan out activity-log lookups in parallel

For each candidate id, call `posthog:feature-flags-activity-retrieve` with `limit: 5, page: 1`. **Issue all calls in one message so they run concurrently** — sequential calls are dramatically slower.

```text
call feature-flags-activity-retrieve {"id": <flag_id>, "limit": 5, "page": 1}
```

Reasonable batch sizes:

- "last 7 days" → top 20–25 candidates
- "last 30 days" → top 50
- "last 90 days" → walk the full ~100

If you sample fewer than the full set, say so in the report and offer to walk the rest as a follow-up.

### 4. Extract the deletion event from each response

In each response, find the entry where `activity == "deleted"`. That entry's `created_at` is the actual deletion time, and `user.email` / `user.first_name` identify the deleter. These fields are reliable on every delete path.

For most flags there's exactly one delete event. If a flag has been deleted-and-restored multiple times, take the most recent `activity: deleted` event within the window.

### 5. Recover the original key and report

Feature flags are renamed to `<original>:deleted:<flag_id>` when soft-deleted while still referenced elsewhere (e.g. a stopped experiment) — the id-based suffix frees the original key for reuse. Don't try to recover the original from the activity log's own fields: `detail.changes` only carries the rename on UI/ORM deletes (and is often empty, or missing the `key` entry, on API/MCP/programmatic deletes), and `detail.name` just mirrors whatever the current key is — tombstoned or not.

Instead, strip the suffix deterministically with [`scripts/strip_deleted_suffix.py`](./scripts/strip_deleted_suffix.py). Pass it the whole step 2 candidate list as JSON in one call — not one invocation per flag:

```bash
echo '[{"id": 1001, "key": "example-banner:deleted:1001"}]' | python3 scripts/strip_deleted_suffix.py
# prints the same array back (pretty-printed), each object gaining an "original_key" field:
# "original_key": "example-banner"
```

Filter the collected deletion events to those whose `created_at` falls inside the requested window. Present as a table, using each row's recovered original key (not the raw tombstoned form) for the "Key" column:

| Flag ID | Key | Deleted at (UTC) | Deleted by |

State your methodology in the report (how many candidates you walked vs. how many soft-deleted flags exist total), so the user knows what was and wasn't checked.

## Watch-outs

- **Borderline cases**: if a deletion is within ~1 hour of the window cutoff, surface it as borderline rather than silently dropping it.
- **Don't trust `created_at` as a proxy for deletion time**: a flag created in 2024 can still have been deleted last week. The activity log is the only authority.
- **Renamed keys are normal**: a flag with key `foo:deleted:12345` was the flag originally keyed `foo` — see step 5 for how to recover it.
- **Walking all candidates is possible but slow**: ~100 parallel activity-log calls is doable. Offer it as a follow-up rather than the default for short windows.

## Example interaction

User: "what flags got deleted in the last week?"

1. Clarify if needed, or note both interpretations: "rolling 7 days ending now (UTC), in the active project"
2. Run the SQL enumeration to get up to 100 soft-deleted candidates ordered by `created_at DESC`
3. Fan out activity-log lookups in parallel across the top ~25 candidates
4. Extract `activity: deleted` entries; filter to those whose `created_at >= now - 7 days`
5. Recover original keys with `scripts/strip_deleted_suffix.py` and report.
   The values below are illustrative, not real project data:

   ```text
   Found 2 feature flags deleted in the last 7 days (rolling, ending 2026-08-14 09:30 UTC):

   | Flag ID | Key                     | Deleted at (UTC)     | Deleted by  |
   |---------|-------------------------|----------------------|-------------|
   | 1001    | example-banner          | 2026-08-13 15:12     | Jane D.     |
   | 1002    | example-checkout-test   | 2026-08-09 21:48     | John S.     |

   Methodology: walked the activity log for the 25 most-recently-created soft-deleted flags.
   The step 2 query hit its 100-row cap, so the project may have more soft-deleted flags than that.
   The other 75 returned candidates were created before late June 2026 and were not checked.
   Want me to walk the rest?
   ```

## Related tools

- `posthog:execute-sql`: Used in step 2 to enumerate soft-deleted candidates against `system.feature_flags`
- `posthog:feature-flags-activity-retrieve`: Used in step 3 to find the actual deletion event for each candidate
- `posthog:feature-flag-get-definition`: Useful if the user then wants to inspect what the deleted flag looked like

## Scripts

- [`scripts/strip_deleted_suffix.py`](./scripts/strip_deleted_suffix.py): recovers original flag keys — see step 5.
Source. Fiche rédigée par iadujour.fr à partir de : Frontmatter, sections et corps du SKILL.md, README du dépôt. Consultée le 13 novembre 2026. PostHog/skills .
MÊME ÉDITEUR

Autres skills PostHog : Observabilité et supervision

Toute la catégorie
PostHogObservabilité et supervision

Ajouter le suivi des erreurs PostHog

instrument-error-tracking

Ajouter le suivi des erreurs PostHog pour capturer et surveiller les exceptions.

Outils : Claude CodeNiveau : Avancémàj 12/11/2026
PostHogObservabilité et supervision

Ajouter PostHog AI Observability

instrument-llm-analytics

Ajouter PostHog AI Observability pour suivre l'utilisation du modèle AI.

Outils : Claude CodeNiveau : Avancémàj 12/11/2026
PostHogObservabilité et supervision

Ajouter une capture de journal PostHog

instrument-logs

Ajouter la capture de journal PostHog pour suivre les journaux d'application.

Outils : Claude CodeNiveau : Intermédiairemàj 12/11/2026
ÉCHANGES

Commentaires.

Un retour d’expérience, une question, une précision sur cette skill ? Les commentaires sont relus avant publication.

Commentaires publiés

Chargement des commentaires…

    Laisser un commentaire

    Charte de modération. Chaque commentaire est relu avant publication. Sont refusés : l’incitation à la haine, les propos injurieux ou discriminatoires, la publicité, le spam et les liens promotionnels, le hors-sujet et les données personnelles d’autrui.