En bref
Point de départ pour explorer comment les outils d'un serveur PostHog MCP sont utilisés — dirige une question générale vers l'outil dactylographié qui y répond. Utilisez quand l'utilisateur demande "comment fait mon MCP?", "que dois-je regarder?", "explorer mes appels d'outils", "qui utilise mes outils MCP?", "que font les agents avec le MCP?", ou colle une URL analytique MCP sans question spécifique. Offre un menu de questions, chacune soutenue par un outil de requête, puis se livre à la compétence ciblée.
Ce que ça fait
- métrique d'abord
- Questions suggérées
- Trouver le nom de l'outil
Pour qui, et un exemple
Personnes dont la tâche correspond: Pointrail de départ pour explorer comment les outils d'un serveur PostHog MCP sont utilisés — relie une question générale à l'outil dactylographié qui y répond.
Exemple de demande : « Explorer l'utilisation des outils MCP : Point de départ pour explorer comment les outils d'un serveur PostHog MCP sont utilisés — dirige une question générale vers l'outil dactylographié qui y répond. »
Point de départ pour explorer comment les outils d'un serveur PostHog MCP sont utilisés — dirige une question générale vers l'outil dactylographié qui y répond. Exemple rédigé par iadujour.fr à partir du SKILL.md, non testé.
Installer
Claude Code : /plugin marketplace add PostHog/skills, puis /plugin install posthog-all@posthog-skills (README).
/plugin marketplace add PostHog/skills/plugin install posthog-all@posthog-skillsFonctionne avec
- Claude Code
Source : README : marketplace Claude Code `/plugin marketplace add PostHog/skills`. D’autres agents ne sont pas nommés.
Niveau : Intermédiaire
Suppose un projet déjà en place chez l’éditeur et les outils décrits dans le SKILL.md.
À savoir
Extrait du SKILL.md
La description d’origine, celle que l’agent lit pour décider de charger la skill (en anglais) :
Starting point for exploring how a PostHog MCP server's tools are used — routes a broad question to the typed tool that answers it. Use when the user asks "how is my MCP doing?", "what should I look at?", "explore my tool calls", "who uses […]
Citée depuis le SKILL.md au commit 445764b .
Le SKILL.md compte 110 lignes et 6 sections principales :
- Governed metric first
- Suggested questions
- Finding the tool name
- How to use a per-tool tool
- When to drop to SQL
- Related skills
Licence : MIT
Consultée le 13 novembre 2026 : fichier de licence du dépôt.
La licence autorise la reprise : le texte intégral du SKILL.md est reproduit ci-dessous, sans modification, avec sa mention de licence.
Texte intégral du SKILL.md
Reproduit sans modification depuis PostHog/skills (commit 445764b) , © PostHog, sous licence MIT (fichier de licence d’origine ).
Afficher le SKILL.md original (110 lignes, en anglais)
---
name: exploring-mcp-tool-usage
description: >
Starting point for exploring how a PostHog MCP server's tools are used —
routes a broad question to the typed tool that answers it. Use when the user
asks "how is my MCP doing?", "what should I look at?", "explore my tool
calls", "who uses my MCP tools?", "what are agents doing with the MCP?", or
pastes an MCP analytics URL without a specific question. Offers a menu of
questions, each backed by a query tool, then hands off to the focused skill.
---
# Exploring MCP tool usage
Any MCP server instrumented with the `@posthog/mcp` SDK emits a `$mcp_tool_call`
event every time an agent invokes a tool. This skill is the **front door** for a
user who knows they want to look at their MCP tool usage but hasn't picked a
specific question. Offer the menu below, then route to the tool — or the focused
skill — that answers what they choose.
## Governed metric first
When the question asks for an MCP failure rate or percentage, call `posthog:metric-list` before any typed tool or SQL recipe and look for `mcp_tool_call_fail_pct`. Run an approved, non-drifted match with `posthog:data-catalog-metric-run` for the canonical headline. If the user also asks which tool or harness drives failures, answer the headline first, then use the per-tool workflows below for a noncanonical breakdown. If no governed metric matches, say so and label the derived rate noncanonical.
Every per-tool tool here takes a
`toolName` (the effective tool name — resolved server-side, so pass the name the
agent actually invokes — **except `posthog:query-mcp-tool-failures`**, which
matches `$exception` events and so takes the raw registered `$mcp_tool_name`)
plus a `dateRange`, and runs the same query runner the tool-detail UI uses. So
results match the UI, and you never hand-write the HogQL.
## Suggested questions
Lead with these when the user is unsure what to ask:
| Ask the user… | Answered by |
| ------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| "Which tools fail most, or are slowest?" | `exploring-mcp-tool-quality` (ranks all tools), then `posthog:query-mcp-tool-stats` to drill in |
| "How is tool X doing overall?" | `posthog:query-mcp-tool-stats` — calls, errors, p50/p95, users, sessions, intents |
| "How has tool X trended?" | `posthog:query-mcp-tool-daily-stats` — day-by-day series |
| "Why is tool X failing?" | `posthog:query-mcp-tool-failures` — top error messages, by harness (raw tool name) |
| "Who uses tool X the most?" | `posthog:query-mcp-tool-top-users` — top callers (incl. person email/name) |
| "What gets called right before/after tool X?" | `posthog:query-mcp-tool-neighbors` (`neighborDirection: before`/`after`) |
| "What are agents trying to do with tool X?" | `posthog:query-mcp-tool-sample-intents` — recent agent intents |
| "What description is tool X registered with?" | `posthog:query-mcp-tool-descriptions` — distinct descriptions seen |
| "Which harnesses use my MCP, how reliably?" | `posthog:query-mcp-harness-breakdown` — calls/errors/sessions per client |
| "What are agents trying to do, across all tools?" | `exploring-mcp-intent-clusters` — semantic goal clusters |
| "Who is connecting, and how active are they?" | `posthog:mcp-analytics-sessions-list` — one row per session, with client and person |
| "What did this one session do?" | `exploring-mcp-sessions` — a single agent run's tool sequence |
## Finding the tool name
The per-tool tools need a `toolName`. If the user named a tool, pass it. If they
asked a broad "which tool…" question, start with `exploring-mcp-tool-quality` to
rank the tools, pick the one that stands out, then drill in with the per-tool
tools above. The name to pass is the **effective** tool name (the inner tool for
single-exec wrapper calls) — the same string the tool-quality ranking returns.
The one exception is `posthog:query-mcp-tool-failures`, which matches `$exception`
events by the raw registered `$mcp_tool_name`, not the effective inner tool.
## How to use a per-tool tool
Call it with the tool name and a window, e.g. for the headline numbers of a tool:
```text
posthog:query-mcp-tool-stats { "toolName": "<tool>", "dateRange": { "date_from": "-7d" } }
```
Then offer a natural follow-up from the menu — e.g. after
`posthog:query-mcp-tool-stats` shows a high error rate, reach for
`posthog:query-mcp-tool-failures`; after it shows broad reach, reach for
`posthog:query-mcp-tool-top-users` or `posthog:query-mcp-tool-neighbors`.
## When to drop to SQL
**Covered by a typed tool — don't hand-write SQL for these:**
| Question | Tool |
| ---------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- |
| One tool's headline numbers | `posthog:query-mcp-tool-stats` |
| One tool's day-by-day trend | `posthog:query-mcp-tool-daily-stats` |
| One tool's top errors | `posthog:query-mcp-tool-failures` |
| One tool's top callers | `posthog:query-mcp-tool-top-users` |
| Tools called before/after one tool | `posthog:query-mcp-tool-neighbors` |
| One tool's recent agent intents | `posthog:query-mcp-tool-sample-intents` |
| One tool's registered descriptions | `posthog:query-mcp-tool-descriptions` |
| Usage split by client harness | `posthog:query-mcp-harness-breakdown` |
| List sessions | `posthog:mcp-analytics-sessions-list` |
| One session's tool calls | `posthog:mcp-analytics-sessions-tool-calls` |
**Not covered — use `posthog:execute-sql`:**
- Cross-tool rankings (the tool-quality matrix — "which tool errors most?")
- Errored-session filtering (the session list has no error filter or error count)
- Effective tool names inside a session (`posthog:mcp-analytics-sessions-tool-calls`
returns the raw `$mcp_tool_name`, not the inner tool of a wrapper call)
- Any custom breakdown
`posthog:execute-sql` is also the fallback when the tools in the table above aren't
in your tool list. Query `$mcp_tool_call` directly; the schema and recipes are in
[`models-mcp.md`](../../../posthog_ai/skills/querying-posthog-data/references/models-mcp.md).
## Related skills
- [`exploring-mcp-tool-quality`](../exploring-mcp-tool-quality/SKILL.md) — rank
tools by error rate / latency / reach, then drill in
- [`exploring-mcp-sessions`](../exploring-mcp-sessions/SKILL.md) — a single agent
run and its tool sequence
- [`exploring-mcp-intent-clusters`](../exploring-mcp-intent-clusters/SKILL.md) —
agent goals grouped by semantic similarity
Dans l’annuaire
Cas d’usage et guides qui partagent un thème, un métier ou un outil avec cette skill.
Commentaires.
Un retour d’expérience, une question, une précision sur cette skill ? Les commentaires sont relus avant publication.
Commentaires publiés
Chargement des commentaires…
Laisser un commentaire
Charte de modération. Chaque commentaire est relu avant publication. Sont refusés : l’incitation à la haine, les propos injurieux ou discriminatoires, la publicité, le spam et les liens promotionnels, le hors-sujet et les données personnelles d’autrui.