DES CAS D’USAGE D’IA À REPRENDRE.Édition française · Particuliers, indépendants, TPE
PostHog

Critères d'audit

auditing-endpoints

En bref

Vérifier chaque point final d'un projet PostHog pour détecter l'impasse, les matérialisations ratées et les versions matérialisées inutilisées. Utilisez quand l'utilisateur demande « Quels sont les paramètres que je peux nettoyer ? », « sont-ils cassés ? », « quelles versions matérialisées sont-elles encore appelées ? », ou veut un passage de nettoyage d'une capture sur le produit Endpoints. Produit un rapport priorisé groupé par type d'émission, avec des actions recommandées mais ne modifie rien sans confirmation explicite.

Ce que ça fait

  • Quand utiliser cette compétence
  • Outils disponibles
  • Ce qui compte comme problème

Pour qui, et un exemple

Personnes dont la tâche correspond: Vérifier chaque point final dgovernmental dans un projet PostHog pour l'impasse, les matérialisations ratées et les versions matérialisées inutilisées.

Exemple de demande : « Critères d'audit : Vérifier chaque point final d'un projet PostHog pour détecter l'impasse, les matérialisations ratées et les versions matérialisées inutilisées. »

Vérifier chaque point final d'un projet PostHog pour détecter l'impasse, les matérialisations ratées et les versions matérialisées inutilisées. Exemple rédigé par iadujour.fr à partir du SKILL.md, non testé.

Installer

Claude Code : /plugin marketplace add PostHog/skills, puis /plugin install posthog-all@posthog-skills (README).

/plugin marketplace add PostHog/skills
/plugin install posthog-all@posthog-skills

Fonctionne avec

  • Claude Code

Source : README : marketplace Claude Code `/plugin marketplace add PostHog/skills`. D’autres agents ne sont pas nommés.

Niveau : Intermédiaire

Suppose un projet déjà en place chez l’éditeur et les outils décrits dans le SKILL.md.

À savoir

Dépôt officiel PostHog (github.com/PostHog/skills). Skills pour l’analytique produit, les indicateurs de fonctionnalité, le suivi d’erreurs et les workflows d’équipe.

Extrait du SKILL.md

La description d’origine, celle que l’agent lit pour décider de charger la skill (en anglais) :

Audit every endpoint in a PostHog project for staleness, failed materialisations, and unused materialised versions. Use when the user asks "what endpoints can I clean up?", "are any of my endpoints broken?", "which materialised versions are […]

Citée depuis le SKILL.md au commit 445764b .

Le SKILL.md compte 211 lignes et 7 sections principales :

  • When to use this skill
  • Available tools
  • What counts as an issue
  • Workflow
  • Endpoints audit — 9 issues
  • Example interaction
  • Important notes

Licence : MIT

Consultée le 13 novembre 2026 : fichier de licence du dépôt.

La licence autorise la reprise : le texte intégral du SKILL.md est reproduit ci-dessous, sans modification, avec sa mention de licence.

Texte intégral du SKILL.md

Reproduit sans modification depuis PostHog/skills (commit 445764b) , © PostHog, sous licence MIT (fichier de licence d’origine ).

Afficher le SKILL.md original (211 lignes, en anglais)
---
name: auditing-endpoints
description: >
  Audit every endpoint in a PostHog project for staleness, failed materialisations, and unused
  materialised versions. Use when the user asks "what endpoints can I clean up?", "are any of my
  endpoints broken?", "which materialised versions are still being called?", or wants a one-shot
  cleanup pass over the Endpoints product. Produces a prioritised report grouped by issue type, with
  recommended actions but does not modify anything without explicit confirmation.
---

# Auditing endpoints

This skill produces a project-wide audit of the Endpoints product. Use it when the user wants to
**find what to clean up** — unused endpoints, failing materialisations, materialised versions that
nobody calls any more. It does not modify anything; it reports.

The deeper investigation per endpoint is `diagnosing-endpoint-performance`. The audit's job is to
find candidates and hand off.

## When to use this skill

- "Audit my endpoints" / "What endpoints can I clean up?"
- The user is taking over a project and wants to know what they've inherited
- A periodic review (monthly / quarterly) of endpoint sprawl
- The user is over a materialisation cost budget and wants to know what to disable

The dedicated tools give a fast endpoint-level view. For call frequency, recency, and cost over
time, query the `query_log` table with `execute-sql` (endpoint-level). Per-version recency comes
from `endpoint-versions` — each version carries its own `last_executed_at`.

## Available tools

| Tool                              | What it's for                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| --------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `execute-sql` (HogQL)             | **Primary read path.** Query `system.data_modeling_endpoints` for metadata (name, is_active, current_version, derived_from_insight, last_executed_at) and `query_log` for endpoint-level usage (call counts, recency, duration, bytes) |
| `endpoint-materialization-status` | Per endpoint: is materialisation eligible, current status, last run, last error (not in the system tables — use this tool)                                                                                                             |
| `endpoint-versions`               | All versions for one endpoint, latest first, with each version's query, materialisation state, and `last_executed_at`                                                                                                                  |
| `endpoint-update`                 | Write path — disable (`is_active: false`) or unmaterialise (`is_materialized: false`) after the user confirms                                                                                                                          |
| `agent-feedback`                  | Tell the PostHog team what's missing or confusing in this flow so the product and skill improve                                                                                                                                        |

Prefer reading from the system tables over the `endpoints-get-all` / `endpoint-get` tools — one
SQL query returns the whole inventory and lets you join metadata to usage in `query_log`.

## What counts as an issue

| Category                        | Trigger                                                                                          | Typical action                                     |
| ------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------- |
| **Never called**                | No rows in `query_log` for the endpoint (personal-API-key calls only)                            | Confirm with the user, then disable                |
| **Stale**                       | `query_log` shows the last call more than 30 days ago                                            | Confirm with the user; often safe to disable       |
| **Inactive**                    | `is_active = 0` in `system.data_modeling_endpoints`                                              | Verify intent; if abandoned, delete                |
| **Failing materialisation**     | `endpoint-materialization-status` returns `Failed` with an error                                 | Hand off to `diagnosing-endpoint-performance`      |
| **Unused materialised version** | A materialised version whose `last_executed_at` (from `endpoint-versions`) is null or long stale | Unmaterialise that version, or roll to a newer one |
| **Drifted versions**            | Many versions exist (query changed repeatedly)                                                   | History noise — not an issue, but worth noting     |

Usage counts only **personal-API-key calls** — an endpoint exercised solely from the Playground
tab or the app will look unused. Per-version `last_executed_at` is recorded only for runs since
that tracking was added, so a version can read null while still being used; always confirm before
removing.

## Workflow

### 1. List endpoints and their metadata

One `execute-sql` query gets the whole inventory from `system.data_modeling_endpoints`:

```sql
SELECT name, is_active, current_version, derived_from_insight, last_executed_at
FROM system.data_modeling_endpoints
ORDER BY name
```

No rows → the project has no endpoints; say so and stop. Don't invent issues. (The
`last_executed_at` column here is a convenience endpoint-level timestamp; for call frequency and
cost, use `query_log` in the next step.)

### 2. Pull usage from `query_log`

`query_log` records every personal-API-key call, tagged with the endpoint name. One query gives
recency and call counts across all endpoints:

```sql
SELECT name, count() AS calls, max(query_start_time) AS last_called
FROM query_log
WHERE endpoint LIKE '%/endpoints/%' AND is_personal_api_key_request
GROUP BY name
ORDER BY name
```

Cross-reference with step 1:

- **In metadata, absent from `query_log`** → never called via API key
- **Last call more than 30 days ago** → stale

`query_log` also exposes `query_duration_ms`, `read_rows`, and `read_bytes` per call — useful to
flag expensive endpoints in the same pass. This is endpoint-level; per-version recency comes from
`endpoint-versions` (step 3).

### 3. Check materialisation health and unused versions

For each materialised endpoint, call `endpoint-materialization-status` (this isn't in the system
tables). Surface any with `status: "Failed"` separately — these are active failures, not staleness.

Then call `endpoint-versions` and read each version's `last_executed_at`: a **materialised**
version that's null or long stale is an unused-materialised-version candidate. Treat this as a
lead, not proof — per-version recency only counts API-key runs since tracking was added, so confirm
with the user before unmaterialising.

### 4. Present the audit

Render a prioritised report grouped by category. Don't dump raw JSON; use a readable table per
section:

```text
## Endpoints audit — 9 issues

### 🔴 Failing materialisations (1)
- weekly_revenue (v3) — Failed 2h ago, "Column 'event_date' does not exist"
  → hand off to diagnosing-endpoint-performance

### 🟠 Never called via API key (3)
- internal_admin_query — created 5 months ago
- legacy_signup_funnel — created 1 year ago, materialised
- experiment_arm_lookup — created 9 months ago

### 🟠 Unused materialised versions (2)  [from endpoint-versions]
- monthly_active_users — v3 materialised, last_executed_at null (currently on v4 — unmaterialise v3)
- order_summary — v1 materialised, last_executed_at null

### 🟡 Stale (3)
- holiday_promo_2024 — last called 4 months ago
- ab_test_phase_1 — last called 2 months ago
- daily_revenue_cohort — last called 45 days ago

Recommended order:
1. Investigate the failing materialisation (blocks fresh data)
2. Unmaterialise the unused versions (free storage + compute)
3. Disable the never-called endpoints (if user confirms)
4. Review stale endpoints with the user
```

The exact format is less important than: prioritised, grouped, actionable, and hand-off
clear.

### 5. Offer the next step

End with a clear question, not a decision:

- "Want me to unmaterialise the unused versions?" — needs `endpoint-update` with
  `is_materialized: false` per version
- "Want me to disable the never-called endpoints?" — needs `endpoint-update` with `is_active: false`
- "Want me to dig into the failing materialisation?" — hands off to
  `diagnosing-endpoint-performance`

**Never act from the audit alone.** Disabling or unmaterialising affects external API consumers;
always confirm before modifying.

## Example interaction

```text
User: "Audit my endpoints"

Agent steps:
- execute-sql on system.data_modeling_endpoints → 12 endpoints (4 materialised)
- execute-sql on query_log grouped by name → 8 endpoints have calls
- endpoint-materialization-status on each materialised endpoint → 1 failing
- endpoint-versions on the materialised ones → order_summary v2's last_executed_at is null

- Report:
  "Found 6 things worth looking at across 12 endpoints:

   🔴 Failing materialisations (1)
   - monthly_active_users (v2) — materialisation failed yesterday with
     'memory limit exceeded'. The endpoint is still callable inline but
     responses will be slower.

   🟠 Never called via API key (3)
   - legacy_funnel_v1 — created 11 months ago
   - test_export — created 3 months ago
   - admin_dump — created 8 months ago, materialised (wasteful)

   🟠 Unused materialised versions (1)  [from endpoint-versions]
   - order_summary v2 — materialised but its last_executed_at is null
     while v3 is current. Likely safe to unmaterialise v2.

   🟡 Stale (1)
   - holiday_2024 — last called 5 months ago

   Caveat: usage only counts personal-API-key calls; playground and
   dashboard runs aren't counted. Per-version recency comes from
   endpoint-versions and is sparse. Confirm before disabling.

   Want me to start with the failing materialisation, or clean up the
   unused version first?"
```

## Important notes

- **The audit is read-only.** Never call destructive tools from this flow. Hand off or confirm
  before any modification.
- **Empty = healthy.** Don't pad an empty report with theoretical issues. "Nothing to clean up"
  is a good answer.
- **Read with SQL, drill in with the version tool.** `system.data_modeling_endpoints` (metadata)
  and `query_log` (endpoint-level call counts, recency, cost) via `execute-sql` answer most of the
  audit. Per-version recency comes from `endpoint-versions` (each version's `last_executed_at`).
- **API-key-only scope.** Usage only counts personal-API-key calls. An endpoint exercised only from
  the Playground tab or the app will look unused. Always confirm before acting.
- **Materialisation costs storage and compute.** When an endpoint no longer needs materialisation,
  the cheapest fix is `endpoint-update` with `is_materialized: false` — not deleting the endpoint.
- **Inactive ≠ stale.** An endpoint with `is_active: false` was deliberately turned off. Don't
  recommend deletion unless the user confirms it's truly abandoned.
Source. Fiche rédigée par iadujour.fr à partir de : Frontmatter, sections et corps du SKILL.md, README du dépôt. Consultée le 13 novembre 2026. PostHog/skills .
MÊME ÉDITEUR

Autres skills PostHog : DevOps et déploiement

Toute la catégorie
PostHogDevOps et déploiement

Ajouter l'intégration SDK PostHog

instrument-integration

Ajouter l'intégration PostHog SDK à votre application.

Outils : Claude CodeNiveau : Avancémàj 12/11/2026
PostHogDevOps et déploiement

Migrant depuis average client.io

migrating-from-customer-io

Déplacez les automatismes Customer.io dans PostHog comme flux de travail.

Outils : Claude CodeNiveau : Intermédiairemàj 12/11/2026
PostHogDevOps et déploiement

Gestion des appels LLM

managing-llm-prompts

Créezlife, version, release et filez les invites LLM avec la gestion rapide PostHog.

Outils : Claude CodeNiveau : Avancémàj 11/11/2026
ÉCHANGES

Commentaires.

Un retour d’expérience, une question, une précision sur cette skill ? Les commentaires sont relus avant publication.

Commentaires publiés

Chargement des commentaires…

    Laisser un commentaire

    Charte de modération. Chaque commentaire est relu avant publication. Sont refusés : l’incitation à la haine, les propos injurieux ou discriminatoires, la publicité, le spam et les liens promotionnels, le hors-sujet et les données personnelles d’autrui.