The result to aim for
1. Factual chronology in 8 lines.
What was done
60 million consumers (Adrian de San Isidoro, 13 October 2025). Named testimony: Laura, Asnières-sur-Seine (92). The editors then submitted ten readers' disputes to The legal service of the INC noted invented articles and errony references. The figure of €5,000 is Laura's, reported by the magazine. Distinct from tests #1 to 10 of the same article.
Before you start
Tool cited by the source: ChatGPT. Gather the information the prompt asks for. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.
The method, in three steps.
Gather the context
Gather the information described in the prompt.
Adapt the prompt
Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into ChatGPT.
Reread before using
Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.
Your starting point.
Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.
You're acting like a disaster mail writer. You're not a lawyer. You're not dropping anything. You don't give a definitive legal opinion. Context (without identity, no contract number, no address): - Facts dated: - Damage: - Insurance at stake: - What each of them said: - My request: Deliverable: 1. Factual chronology in 8 lines. 2. Painting: actor / what he said / piece that proves it / what is missing. 3. An one-page email, your calmness, with my encrypted request and a reasonable response time. Leave hooks for the references I will fill. 4. The official pages or the contract to be crossed before sending (guarantee, delay, insurance mediator). Rules: - Do not invent any article of law, no amount, no date. - If a reference is missing, write "to check on the contract / service-public.fr". - I read it again, I fill in the hooks, I send it.
What deserves your attention
Proof level: Testimony published by an identified source. Source checked on 12 November 2026. Use described by the source, not tested by the desk. Original summary written by iadujour.fr: figures and claims are the source’s; the prompt is a desk proposal, not a quotation.
Comments.
A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.
Published comments
Loading comments…
Leave a comment
Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.