The result to aim for
Élodie Lahaye, at Balzac College in Azay-le-Rideau, set Mizou: the third educate with Antigone "to try to convince her not to bury Polynice". "The analysis of the exchanges seems to me to be the most important part because it allowed to show the flaws of this chatbot that unlike the students did not read the play. »
What was done
Le Café pédagogique (Jean-Michel Le Baut, May 26, 2025). Mizou added; No student account. Distinct from Fraichot (Anne Frank, other URL). End of article: no mention partner Mizou. No student copy is published.
Before you start
Tool cited by the source: Mizou. Gather the information the prompt asks for. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.
The method, in three steps.
Gather the context
Gather the information described in the prompt.
Adapt the prompt
Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into the AI assistant you use. The cited tool (Mizou) is not necessarily available to the public..
Reread before using
Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.
Your starting point.
Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.
Role of the bot (facts): Antigone, do not yield, remain faithful to the play of Anouilh. Student instructions: argue, adapt to the replica. Write the rapid bot in 8 lines. Invent no fact out of the room. Don't write the paper.
What deserves your attention
Proof level: Testimony published by an identified source. Source checked on 10 November 2026. Use described by the source, not tested by the desk. Original summary written by iadujour.fr: figures and claims are the source’s; the prompt is a desk proposal, not a quotation.
Comments.
A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.
Published comments
Loading comments…
Leave a comment
Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.