AI USE CASES YOU CAN REUSE.English edition · Individuals, independents, small businesses
Spotted on the web

Frame a search with Perplexity, without delegating everything to it

Use described publicly by L’Etudiant — Irène, recherche en psychologie (12 October 2026), summarised by the desk. Not tested by iadujour.

The result to aim for

Irene appealed to Perplexity during her research in psychology, supported in July 2026: she "had the impression of doing a double search". Having "tested" and "approved" the tool allowed him to talk about it with his thesis director and to define a "true framework". "It is necessary to be very disciplined in the use that one makes of it, in what one delegates to it. »

What was done

Student (Yslande Bossé, October 12, 2026). Today at the Paraphrase laboratory, Paris University 8. Distinct from Linda (first synthetic jet) and Chloë (Codex). No thesis title is published.

Before you start

Tool cited by the source: Perplexity. Fill in the bracketed items: [5 lignes], [10 lignes]. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.

The method, in three steps.

  1. Gather the context

    Spot the bracketed items in the prompt ([5 lignes], [10 lignes]) and prepare what they ask for.

  2. Adapt the prompt

    Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into Perplexity.

  3. Reread before using

    Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.

Your starting point.

Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.

The prompt to customise
Research question (facts): [5 lignes]. Extract read (facts): [10 lignes].

Proposes 8 tracks only after the extract. If a reference is not there, say so. No author invented.

What deserves your attention

A generated track is not the source. Cross-reference each reference to the original article, and do not delegate the argument.
Origin of the case. Use described publicly by L’Etudiant — Irène, recherche en psychologie (12 October 2026).
Proof level: Testimony published by an identified source. Source checked on 10 November 2026. Use described by the source, not tested by the desk. Original summary written by iadujour.fr: figures and claims are the source’s; the prompt is a desk proposal, not a quotation.
TO GO FURTHER

Other ideas to put to work.

The whole Learning theme
DISCUSSION

Comments.

A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.

Published comments

Loading comments…

    Leave a comment

    Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.