AI USE CASES YOU CAN REUSE.English edition · Individuals, independents, small businesses
Spotted on the web

Create a fake news, then debunker

Use described publicly by Académie de Montpellier — Nicolas Gaube, enseignant (16 May 2025), summarised by the desk. Not tested by iadujour.

The result to aim for

Nicolas Gaube, a teacher, has his students produce a 4th SVT fake news with theIA, then his debunk on the back. They see the processes before they meet them elsewhere.

What was done

Académie de Montpellier, TraAM SVT 2024-2025 (Nicolas Gaube, 16 May 2025). Illustrated maps, EMI with the documentary professor. Distinct from Latour (writing plan, other URL) and Briand (synthesis without copying, other URL). No name copy is published.

Before you start

Tool cited by the source: ChatGPT. Fill in the bracketed items: [extrait]. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.

The method, in three steps.

  1. Gather the context

    Spot the bracketed items in the prompt ([extrait]) and prepare what they ask for.

  2. Adapt the prompt

    Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into ChatGPT.

  3. Reread before using

    Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.

Your starting point.

Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.

The prompt to customise
Course (made, glued, without name): [extrait].
Objective: a misleading statement, then his debunk. Level: 4th.

Proposes 1 statement (2 sentences) and, on the back, 5 debunk facts only after extract, plus 1 source to check (title).
Invent no data. Don't write the name of a student.

What deserves your attention

We do not recommend publishing the fake news, or circulating it outside the class. We recommend it to learn how to debunk: course provided, teacher frames, every fact cross-checked.
Origin of the case. Use described publicly by Académie de Montpellier — Nicolas Gaube, enseignant (16 May 2025).
Proof level: Testimony published by an identified source. Source checked on 11 November 2026. Use described by the source, not tested by the desk. Original summary written by iadujour.fr: figures and claims are the source’s; the prompt is a desk proposal, not a quotation.
TO GO FURTHER

Other ideas to put to work.

The whole Learning theme
DISCUSSION

Comments.

A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.

Published comments

Loading comments…

    Leave a comment

    Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.