AI USE CASES YOU CAN REUSE.English edition · Individuals, independents, small businesses
Spotted on the web

Make a course summary, cross-check and then revise it

Use described publicly by L’Alsace — Alexia Chaillet, seconde, Landser (20 February 2026), summarised by the desk. Not tested by iadujour.

The result to aim for

Alexia Chaillet, in second at Landser, asks ChatGPT for abstracts of courses for white events. It compares them with the notebook, completes what is missing, and then revises from this text.

What was done

Alsace (Jean-Christophe Meyer, February 20, 2026). Distinct from Célia (two columns, other URL) and Bintou (quiz, other URL). Jean, Amine and Alexandre (same article): out of wave, 1 person / URL. No summary is published.

Before you start

Tool cited by the source: ChatGPT. Fill in the bracketed items: [leçon]. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.

The method, in three steps.

  1. Gather the context

    Spot the bracketed items in the prompt ([leçon]) and prepare what they ask for.

  2. Adapt the prompt

    Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into ChatGPT.

  3. Reread before using

    Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.

Your starting point.

Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.

The prompt to customise
Course (made, glued, without name): [leçon].
Level: second. Training only.

Provides a summary in 8-12 lines: concepts, dates or definitions, an example from the course.
List other than what you had to interpret. If a point is not in the course, do not invent. Do not write a proof copy.

What deserves your attention

A generated summary is not the course. Cut on the notebook, and do not paste a copy on the test day.
Origin of the case. Use described publicly by L’Alsace — Alexia Chaillet, seconde, Landser (20 February 2026).
Proof level: Testimony published by an identified source. Source checked on 10 November 2026. Use described by the source, not tested by the desk. Original summary written by iadujour.fr: figures and claims are the source’s; the prompt is a desk proposal, not a quotation.
TO GO FURTHER

Other ideas to put to work.

The whole Learning theme
DISCUSSION

Comments.

A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.

Published comments

Loading comments…

    Leave a comment

    Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.