The result to aim for
Theodore Carloux, a French teacher, has glued the poems of his students from 5th of the Collège Toulouse-Lautrec in Toulouse in Vittasciences.fr to generate images, then to spot gaps, inventions and homonymies — an use designed for college teachers.
What was done
Educational Café (concerned by Jean-Michel Le Baut, 19 January 2026). Sequence "poetic landscape" in 5th (needs groups, back in 2024), before his departure to the French high school Louis Pasteur de Lagos. The students start from a personal image, write, amend via a "Great Draft" A3 after readings (Du Bellay, Apollinaire, Hugo, Nerval, Hugo "Tomorrow from Dawn"), record a reading on the ENT then Audacity. The teacher sticks the texts in Vittasciences.fr, "educational platform thought for learning about AI and coding", poems serving as prompts. Students identify gaps, invented elements, homonymous error or polysaemia. He didn't have time to quickly the students themselves. No score or volume of images is published.
Before you start
Tool cited by the source: Vittasciences. Fill in the bracketed items: [coller]. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.
The method, in three steps.
Gather the context
Spot the bracketed items in the prompt (
[coller]) and prepare what they ask for.Adapt the prompt
Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into the AI assistant you use. The cited tool (Vittasciences) is not necessarily available to the public..
Reread before using
Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.
Your starting point.
Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.
Student poem (anonymized): [coller]. List 6 visual elements faithful to the text, 3 absent from the poem that an AI may add, and 2 ambiguities of homonymousness. Invent no images.
What deserves your attention
Proof level: Testimony published by an identified source. Source checked on 10 November 2026. Use described by the source, not tested by the desk. Original summary written by iadujour.fr: figures and claims are the source’s; the prompt is a desk proposal, not a quotation.
Comments.
A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.
Published comments
Loading comments…
Leave a comment
Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.