AI USE CASES YOU CAN REUSE.English edition · Individuals, independents, small businesses
Spotted on the web

Reword a course point that remains blurred

Use described publicly by Le Progrès — Aurélie, 1re, Notre-Dame-du-Château (19 March 2025), summarised by the desk. Not tested by iadujour.

The result to aim for

Aurélie, in first general at the Lycée Notre-Dame-du-Château (Monistrol-sur-Loire), used for homework: "It allows us to clarify points from the lesson that we did not understand, to have a simpler information. »

What was done

Progress (Julie Garnier, 19 March 2025). Distinct from Aurélie Fliedel (Alan, other person). Ilayda (ideas): same article, out of wave. ChatGPT is the tool named in the article. No note is published.

Before you start

Tool cited by the source: ChatGPT. Fill in the bracketed items: [coller]. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.

The method, in three steps.

  1. Gather the context

    Spot the bracketed items in the prompt ([coller]) and prepare what they ask for.

  2. Adapt the prompt

    Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into ChatGPT.

  3. Reread before using

    Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.

Your starting point.

Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.

The prompt to customise
Not clear (facts, 8 lines): [coller]. Level 1.

Explain more simply, only after these lines. Distinguish what comes from class. If a detail is missing, say it. Don't exercise.

What deserves your attention

A reformulation is not the course. Cross-check each point on the notebook, and do not give it the exercise to return.
Origin of the case. Use described publicly by Le Progrès — Aurélie, 1re, Notre-Dame-du-Château (19 March 2025).
Proof level: Testimony published by an identified source. Source checked on 10 November 2026. Use described by the source, not tested by the desk. Original summary written by iadujour.fr: figures and claims are the source’s; the prompt is a desk proposal, not a quotation.
TO GO FURTHER

Other ideas to put to work.

The whole Learning theme
DISCUSSION

Comments.

A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.

Published comments

Loading comments…

    Leave a comment

    Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.