The result to aim for
The CHU de Poitiers deploys in beta MedGPT, Synapse's medical conversational assistant, which answers common questions (posologies, protocols) from institutional sources such as HAS.
What was done
In an article published on 12 June 2026 on its website, the CHU de Poitiers announces the deployment of MedGPT, developed by the Bordeaux company Synapse. The tool allows doctors and caregivers to obtain rapidement answers to daily questions, such as the dosage of a drug or a clinical protocol, based on institutional sources such as the High Health Authority and official recommendations. The ISD project leader explains that several publishers meeting the security criteria were met, and that the French anchoring and free access were decisive. The IA medical radiologist of the CHU specifies a broader objective: to limit the "shadow AI", the unframed use of generalist AI.Access to AI is blocked on professional posts, but the teams used their phones; MedGPT offers them a controlled alternative. The tool, in beta, will evolve thanks to user feedback and anonymous connection and query data collected by Synapse, which will also be used to identify training needs.
Before you start
Tool cited by the source: MedGPT (Synapse Medicine). Gather the information the prompt asks for. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.
The method, in three steps.
Gather the context
Gather the information described in the prompt.
Adapt the prompt
Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into the AI assistant you use. The cited tool (MedGPT (Synapse Medicine)) is not necessarily available to the public..
Reread before using
Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.
Your starting point.
Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.
I am Answer by indicating: 1. the short answer; 2. the specific official source (recommendation, SPC, protocol) and its date; 3. situations where this response does not apply (renal failure, pregnancy, interactions...). If you don't have a reliable source, say it other than estimated it.
What deserves your attention
Proof level: Institutional source. Source checked on 10 November 2026. Use described by the source, not tested by the desk. Original summary written by iadujour.fr: figures and claims are the source’s; the prompt is a desk proposal, not a quotation.
Comments.
A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.
Published comments
Loading comments…
Leave a comment
Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.