To equip magistrates and clerks with a sovereign IA assistant

What was done

In a press release of September 10, 2026, the Ministry of Justice presents the launch in all jurisdictions of the "digital shock", which includes four projects: the zero papier, a sovereign and secure AI, the portal "My Justice Space" and new tools in jurisdictions. On the AI side, the Ministry already has "My Assistant Justice", a sovereign and secure assistant accessible to 10,000 agents, and experiment in parallel "My Criminal Assistant" and "My Civil Assistant", especially for the analysis and synthesis of files. The stated aim is to free magistrates and clerks from the most repetitive tasks to devote more time to analysis and decision-making. The communiqué states that these tools assist without deciding, that the legal analysis and decision remain entirely in the hands of the magistrate, that the procedures remain within the secure perimeter of the ministry and that the tools do not involve the data of the files submitted to them.

Before you start

Tool cited by the source: Mon Assistant Justice. Gather the information the prompt asks for. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.

The method, in three steps.

1. 01

   Gather the context

   Gather the information described in the prompt.

2. 02

   Adapt the prompt

   Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into the AI assistant you use. The cited tool (Mon Assistant Justice) is not necessarily available to the public..

3. 03

   Reread before using

   Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.

Your starting point.

Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.

Here are the pieces of a folder, numbered:

Preparation for reading sheet:
1. timing of the facts with the corner number for each element;
2. positions of each party;
3. points of contradiction between the pieces;
4. pieces that seem to be missing.
No assessment of the outcome of the case.

What deserves your attention