AI USE CASES YOU CAN REUSE.English edition · Individuals, independents, small businesses
Spotted on the web

Find ecological monitoring in natural language, at Urbasolar

Use described publicly by Le Journal des Entreprises — Géraldine Lapierre (Urbasolar) (25 June 2026), summarised by the desk. Not tested by iadujour.

The result to aim for

Géraldine LZZPK0Zerre, project manager at Urbasolar (Montpellier, 500 employees), has been running an internal chatbot: the 30 project developers, in all agencies, have been using it since 2025 to retrieve the information requested by the state services, instead of searching for 100-page follow-ups.

What was done

The Business Journal (Anthony Rey, June 25, 2026). More than 100 ground plants are concerned. Semantic search then Julien Burato: the tool says "immediately" if there is a return of experience on a species. Distinct from CNR / Saga Décor (maintenance documentation). Noverage search time is published.

Before you start

Tool cited by the source: Chatbot interne (ChatGPT); other tools cited: ChatGPT. Fill in the bracketed items: [espèce, mesure], [coller 12 lignes]. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.

The method, in three steps.

  1. Gather the context

    Spot the bracketed items in the prompt ([espèce, mesure], [coller 12 lignes]) and prepare what they ask for.

  2. Adapt the prompt

    Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into ChatGPT.

  3. Reread before using

    Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.

Your starting point.

Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.

The prompt to customise
Question of state services (facts, without site name): [espèce, mesure]. Follow-up extracts already opened: [coller 12 lignes].

Answer in 10 lines only after the excerpts. If there is a lack of experience, say so. No species.

What deserves your attention

A response from the catbot is not the impact study. Cross-check each species and measure on source tracking before writing to administration, and stay on the internal tool.
Origin of the case. Use described publicly by Le Journal des Entreprises — Géraldine Lapierre (Urbasolar) (25 June 2026).
Proof level: Testimony published by an identified source. Source checked on 10 November 2026. Use described by the source, not tested by the desk. Original summary written by iadujour.fr: figures and claims are the source’s; the prompt is a desk proposal, not a quotation.
TO GO FURTHER

Other ideas to put to work.

The whole Research & watch theme
DISCUSSION

Comments.

A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.

Published comments

Loading comments…

    Leave a comment

    Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.