The result to aim for
1. Structure of the mail: object, facts dated, documents, request, reasonable response time.
What was done
ICI Orléans / France Bleu (Pascal Hernandez, March 13, 2026). No lawyer; experienced use (sent mail), not a test to reject the tool. Philippe (photo generated): same program, off-line. Datadome / 403 on some crawlers; the body has been read (extracts dated from the same title). No name letter is published.
Before you start
Tool cited by the source: ChatGPT. Gather the information the prompt asks for. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.
The method, in three steps.
Gather the context
Gather the information described in the prompt.
Adapt the prompt
Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into ChatGPT.
Reread before using
Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.
Your starting point.
Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.
Structure a complaint letter, then make it calm and clear. No article of law invented. Context (without line number or identifier): - Facts: - What I've tried before: - What I'm asking: - My current draft: Deliverable: 1. Structure of the mail: object, facts dated, documents, request, reasonable response time. 2. Draft of 12 to 18 lines, tone, plain French. 3. 4 lines of action (mediator, alert) with "to be checked on service-public.fr", without mentioning an article of memory. Rules: - Do not invent any article of law, no amount, no legal period. - Distinguish what is to be copied from my facts and what is a proposed formulation. - It's not a legal opinion. I'll read it again.
What deserves your attention
Proof level: Testimony published by an identified source. Source checked on 10 November 2026. Use described by the source, not tested by the desk. Original summary written by iadujour.fr: figures and claims are the source’s; the prompt is a desk proposal, not a quotation.
Comments.
A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.
Published comments
Loading comments…
Leave a comment
Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.