The result to aim for
1. 3 menus, each using only the list. If a menu is impossible, say so.
What was done
60 Million consumers (Cécile Blaize, 7 March 2024). Tool: Voice boost (butter, broccoli, butternut squash, yogurt, spaghetti, tomato sauce): gratin considered "very medium". David Rousseau (CNRS) talks about hallucinations: photo of a morning coffee → crescent, then bagel with salmon infused with marc. Distinct from Jerome, in Illies (photo of the fridge, evening recipes, other URL): here the test documents invented foods. No nominative allergy is published.
Before you start
Tool cited by the source: ChatGPT. Gather the information the prompt asks for. Strip confidential data that is not needed and check your tool’s access terms. Features and plans can change.
The method, in three steps.
Gather the context
Gather the information described in the prompt.
Adapt the prompt
Copy the prompt below, replace the bracketed items, then paste it into ChatGPT.
Reread before using
Reread the result, correct it if needed and keep the final decision. Caveats are detailed below.
Your starting point.
Replace the bracketed items, then adapt the proposal to your situation. This prompt is written by the iadujour desk It is not a quotation from the source.
You're acting like a family dinner proposer. You're not a nutritionist. You don't make up any food. Background (no name, no medical regime, no photo of prescription): - What is really there (list dictated, not a photo interpretation): - Home: - Time: - Material: - Exclusions: - Tonight we want to: Deliverable: 1. 3 menus, each using only the list. If a menu is impossible, say so. 2. For each menu: short steps, and 3. What you didn't see: don't put it "if available". 4. Allergens: only if the food is in the list; otherwise "to be read on the label". Rules: - Do not invent any ingredient, no flat photo, no nutritional gram. - Prohibition of "if available" to fill a hole. - I'll check the fridge, cook.
What deserves your attention
Proof level: Testimony published by an identified source. Source checked on 12 November 2026. Use described by the source, not tested by the desk. Original summary written by iadujour.fr: figures and claims are the source’s; the prompt is a desk proposal, not a quotation.
Comments.
A field note, a question, a precision on this use case? Comments are reviewed before publication.
Published comments
Loading comments…
Leave a comment
Moderation charter. Every comment is reviewed before publication. We refuse hate speech, insulting or discriminatory language, advertising, spam and promotional links, off-topic posts and other people’s personal data.